Á¦ ¸ñ  vWXsAEdELIvG
ÀÌ ¸§  non owners a ³¯ Â¥  2018-11-07 16:24 H/E   [mail][home]
Had the door not opened for the possibility of different result, I wouldn't have bothered but the fact is merits have never been adjudicated. the 0 for 49 (or whatever the number is) results of the past can be thrown out the window and each defense posture will be dealt with. Will they lump them together? No one has a definitive answer on that so speculate all you wish but never discount the underdog. We are a determined bunch of scrappers with simple, reasonable requests and I do hope the Jabonski Atty starts with and hangs his hat on the BC referenced above. As a matter of fact, I'm praying he will do just that.
Total: 49654    409/4966Pages
45574   bLnDRBsEqnemHFbeCK best car ins18-11-0720
45573   wIroqhbHjPDFUZkBoMvD cheapest aut18-11-0729
45572   jJeBFCZkudXbm affordable c18-11-0742
45571   ivwxCFYHrYluCdCrV best auto in18-11-0748
45570  ->  vWXsAEdELIvG non owners a18-11-0752
45569   grkcUoAaeRERdLrelIM free car ins18-11-0740
45568   IxBrAhOvnCLDauC best auto in18-11-0745
45567   dMFPPHPKgLUIZHk car insuranc18-11-0746
45566   MsJZjzLRnTIZ low income a18-11-0742
45565   PSuYCySkdIxsjtzpEXNR car insuranc18-11-0757
[ÀÌÀü 5°³][406][407][408][409][410][´ÙÀ½ 5°³]

Time: 0.43